Bargaining between the Nova Scotia Council of Health Care Unions and the NSHA and IWK has stalled because the Employers are refusing to tell the Unions what they are proposing for key aspects of the new collective agreements.
The Council of Unions bargaining committee is made up of six members from NSGEU, three from CUPE and one from Unifor. That Council has asked repeatedly for the NSHA and IWK to table their full proposals. On Wednesday, November 16, the Employers again refused.
At issue are three key proposals: sick leave, health and life benefits plans and pay plan maintenance (the process that evaluates whether people are properly paid for the work they do).
There are two sick leave plans currently in use across the NSHA and IWK. The Council of Unions has proposed using the current Local 42 Short Term Illness plan for most NSHA and IWK employees and it has proposed keeping the existing short-term illness plan for Public Health Addictions and Continuing Care employees. Among other things, the Council’s proposed sick plans ensure people who have recurring illnesses or injuries in a short period of time have better sick leave provisions. And it allows people to collect 100 per cent paid sick leave in roughly half the time as the other plan.
The Employers are refusing to say what they will propose despite the fact bargaining has started.
There are also two different group health and life plans in operation at the NSHA and IWK. The Council of Unions has proposed keeping the status quo and leaving people in their existing plans. The Employers have said they just want one plan but are again refusing to say what that plan would be. These benefits plans cover everything from dental care and drug plans to retiree benefits.
With respect to the Joint job Evaluation process, the Council has proposed the current Local 42 method, but with changes that will address delays that have stalled important re-evaluations. The Employers have not tabled a proposal, however, they have recently said they will soon do so.
On November 21 the Council informed the Employers that their refusal to table key proposals leaves the Council at an unfair disadvantage where it is being asked to bargain in the dark and leave critical cornerstone elements of our agreement to be negotiated after issues of key importance to the employer are dealt with. The Council is keen to move ahead with bargaining once the Employer tables all its proposals but will not bargain under circumstances that provide a strategic advantage to the Employers. We will keep you updated on any new developments.
For further information on the bargaining process to date, as well as background on the formation of the Health Care Bargaining Council, please visit the NSGEU website.
If you have questions or concerns about the bargaining process, please contact a member of your bargaining committee:
- Patrick Daigle (Local 100), firstname.lastname@example.org
- Monika Harvey (Local 193), email@example.com
- Donna Kline (Local 122), firstname.lastname@example.org
- Allan Lapierre (Local 100), email@example.com
- Peter Perry (Local 122), firstname.lastname@example.org
- Cindy Smith-MacDonald (Local 100), email@example.com